The new vote is another wrinkle in New York’s ongoing rush to erect new casinos and general gaming attractions, spurred by the race for three casino gaming licenses.
One of the biggest motivators for the redevelopment of the Nassau property is the ability to create an estimated 8,500 jobs and an additional $100 million in annual revenue.
"It's taking a property sitting there for more than four decades and giving it life, to make sure it's a generator of taxes," said Matthew Aracich, the president of the Building and Construction Trades Council of Nassau and Suffolk Counties.
But despite the economic benefits, the project has received anything but universal support. On Sunday, a protest was held by dissenting locals and officials that said a new casino would only increase traffic and crime.
There’s also a philosophical debate about whether or not expanding casino offerings is what New York needs in the first place, especially given the casino arms race that is occurring in nearby NYC.
“That site should be redeveloped,” Westbury Mayor Peter I. Cavallaro said. “It's begging to be redeveloped. It should have been redeveloped a while ago. But a casino is the exact wrong thing to be putting at that site.”
Despite the negative outcry, Las Vegas Sands released a statement that said it was appreciative of the opportunity to add a world-class gaming facility to its resume and looks forward to working alongside and in the best interest of community members to develop an area they were proud of.